Disposed

Shankar Kumar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2015CR. MISC./38410/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in connection with charges under Sections 147, 447, 323, and 354/34 IPC. The court observed that anticipatory bail is not maintainable in such cases as per a previous order in this court. The petitioner was directed to surrender, seek regular bail, and dispose the current petition in the same manner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender, seek regular bail, and have the matter heard; petition disposed of in terms of previous order.

Shankar Kumar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38410 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -165 Year- 2013 Thana -AGAMKUAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Shankar Kumar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar , son of Om Prakash Yadav, resident of village Mahaveer Asthan Daudbigha, Police Station – Agam Kuan, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 04-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶4

The petitioner, is seeking grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No.165 of 2013 registered for the offence under Section 147, 447, 323, 354/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that the petitioner during investigation was on police bail and he never misused the privilege of bail.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is conscious of the fact that in such cases anticipatory bail is not maintainable and he has placed reliance on an order dated 20.3.2014 passed in a case of co- accused of this case vide Cr. Misc. No. 987 of 2014 whereby this court has not entertained the

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38410 of 2014 (2) dt.04-03-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

anticipatory bail petition. However, a prayer is being made that this court may also observe in similar manner as has been indicated in the order dated 20.3.2014 which is quoted

¶10

hereinbelow:-

¶11

“However, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 165 of 2013, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, District - Patna , within a period of four weeks from today and make a prayer for regular bail. If such a prayer is made on behalf of the petitioner, then the same shall be heard and decided strictly in accordance with law in the light of the ratio laid down by this court in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar [2004(3) PLJR 491] as also Bishundeo Sahu vs. State of Bihar (Supra) particularly paragraph – 18.

¶12

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of in

¶13

same terms.

¶14

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶15

Praful/-

¶16

U T

Shankar Kumar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Kumar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salim Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Anjish Kumar Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Iboo @ Ibran @ Ibrahim and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjeev Mandal @ Akhilesh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Anita @ Geeta Devi @ Geeta @ Anita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Naveen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar