This is an oral bail application by the petitioner in connection with offences under the Indian Penal Code. The High Court, after hearing counsel, disposes of the application by refusing to grant bail.
Application for bail rejected; petitioner not granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37049 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37049 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -416 Year- 2014 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Upendra Prasad S/o Mundrika Mahto, resident of village - Nanaura Tola Bhagwal Bigha, P.S.- Nawada Town, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bharat Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmala Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 416 of 2014 for offences under sections 452, 354(B), 376 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is rejected.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a cognizance of an FIR involving offences under sections 452, 354(B), 376 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Upendra Prasad
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
