The Patna High Court dismissed two writ applications filed by Umesh Prasad Sinha as they were not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner who had informed the court that he could not obtain instructions.
Writ applications dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1982 of 1997 (6) dt.10-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1982 of 1997
======================================================
Umesh Prasad Sinha
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1983 of 1997
======================================================
Umesh Prasad Sinha
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CWJC No.1982 of 1997
& CWJC No. 1983 of 1997)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janardan Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ambastha,
A.C. to A.A.G.-15
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
6 10-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even after
contact with his client, he has not been able to get instruction.
In that view of the matter he does not intend to press the
applications.
Accordingly the writ applications are dismissed as not
pressed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
singh/-
U
Umesh Prasad Sinha
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
