Allowed

Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC21 Aug 2015CR. MISC./35973/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, apprehending arrest in a complaint case for offences under Sections 147, 323, 380, 395, and 397 IPC. The bail was to be furnished on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within 12 weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within 12 weeks.

Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35973 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2013 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav son of Chhutharu Yadav 2. Pushparaj Yadav @ Pushparaj Kumar son of Binod Yadav both are resident of Village & P.S-Pratapganj, District-Supaul

¶5

Amod Yadav @ Amod Kumar Yadav 4. Pramod Yadav, both are sons of Rajendra Yadav 5. Rajendra Yadav, son of Late Chhedi Yadav, All are resident of village-Gudiya, P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance :

¶7

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K.Nirala(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 21-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners

¶9

and the State.

¶10

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case wherein processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 380, 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

The accusation is of making assault to the complainant and taking away articles from the house.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the occurrence of 23.06.2012 the complaint was filed on 16.01.2013, whereas on earlier point of time, for the same incidence Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 210 of 2012 was lodged on 02.07.2012, wherein the police submitted final form finding the accusation false against the petitioners. It is

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35973 of 2015 (2) dt.21-08-2015

¶14

2/2

¶15

further submitted that petitioner No. 1 is the own brother of the informant and petitioners’ side has filed a case at earlier point of time.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 166C of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶17

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶18

Shageer/-

¶19

U T

Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Pal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dularchand Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Mojibur Rahman Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.