Allowed

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Aug 2015CR. MISC./34956/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case alleging possession of an ATM card and unauthorized withdrawal of funds. The court required surety bonds and fixed conditions for his release.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions regarding appearance after framing of charges.

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34956 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2015 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Manish Kumar Son of Sri Charitra Singh @ Chalitar Singh, Resident of Village - Eknar, P.S. - Hisua, District - Nawada.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal,(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 05-08-2015 Heard both sides.

¶5

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hisua P.S. case no. 91 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Earlier to this the petitioner had filed an application seeking provisional bail which was allowed. It is stated that on expiry of the period of provisional bail, the petitioner has surrendered in the Court below.

¶7

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was found in possession of ATM card which belonged to some other customer. Further allegation is that a sum of Rs. 25,000/- was withdrawn from using the said ATM card.

¶8

Contention of the petitioner is that the allegation of withdrawal of the amount by using the ATM card is yet to be ascertained. He is in custody for more than two months.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34956 of 2015 (2) dt.05-08-2015

¶10

2/2

¶11

Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, points

¶12

out that there is confessional statement of the petitioner regarding withdrawal of the amount using the said ATM card.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶14

this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Hisua P.S. case no. 91 of 2015,with following conditions:-

¶15

(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶16

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

¶17

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶18

Shyam/U T

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punam Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satyadeo Choudhary Vs Arun Choudhary and Ors.

Pancham Rai Vs Bhuneshwar Singh and Ors.

Dharma Paswan @ Dharmendra Paswan @ Dharo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Rai @ Dabloo and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajnikant Tiwari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.