Allowed

Jai Kishor Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2015CR. MISC./34200/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a case under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Indian Penal Code, imposing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount upon surrender within 12 weeks.

Jai Kishor Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34200 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -SC/ST District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Jai Kishor Yadav S/o late Domi Yadav 2. Sampatia Devi W/o jai Kishor Yadav 3. Sangita Devi W/o Arjun Yadav All are Resident of Village Bardaha, P.S. Narpatganj, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan (Spl.App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶4

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 427, 504, 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(ii) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶5

It is alleged that accused persons entered into the courtyard of the informant abused and assaulted the informant. The accused persons also tried to stripped the informant.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that informant’s side were obstructing the passage of the petitioners when protest was made and for the occurrence of 25.01.2015 the First Information Report was

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34200 of 2015 (2) dt.14-08-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

registered on 03.03.2014. Moreover the occurrence alleged to have taken place inside the house of the informant, hence it can not be treated to be a place of public view.

¶10

A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶11

Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

Shageer/-

¶14

U T

Jai Kishor Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Kishor Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Kunal Kishore @ Kunal Pandey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sandip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bikrama Sharma @ Bikram Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Jagdish Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Bhushan Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar