The Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous case, holding it became infructuous as the petitioner had already been acquitted.
Petitioner's prayer to withdraw the case allowed; case dismissed as withdrawn and infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33231 of 2014 (2) dt.05-08-2015
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33231 of 2014 |
|
|---|---|
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2007 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ====================================================== 1. Randhir Rai @ Randhir Kumar Ray S/o Sri Ram Baran Rai , resident of Village - Mahadeipur , P.S. -Amarpur , District - Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh(App) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 05-08-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner |
| has already been acquitted in this case, hence, prayed for to withdraw this case. Prayer is allowed. |
|
| Accordingly, this case has become infructuous as | |
| dismissed as withdrawn. | |
U |
m.p. (Gopal Prasad, J) T |
Randhir Rai @ Randhir Kumar Ray
The State of Bihar
Gopal Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
