The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous petition. The petitioner was apprehended of arrest for murder and culpable homicide. The court found no grounds to allow the prayer.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30921 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2014 Thana -DEORIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Dharmendra Sah, Son of Late Ram Balak Sah, R/o village- Dharfari Pokharapar, P.S.- Deoria, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest registered under Sections 302, 201 and 364/34 of the I.P.C. in connection with Deoria P.S. Case No. 51 of 2014 pending in the Court of S.D.J.M. (W), Muzaffarpur.
The accusation is that Uma Devi, mother of the informant was taken by the petitioner and three others named in the F.I.R. on the pretext to get executed the sale deed. After reaching at Deoriya, the mother of the informant talked him through her mobile no. 8873184492 on his mobile no. 8651568451 but later on, the informant could not talk to her mother and he received the call through mobile no. 8757100449 about murder of her mother.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30921 of 2014 (2) dt.20-01-2015
2/2
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion.
Admittedly, the mother of the informant is still traceless, who has been accompanied by the petitioner and other for Deoria to get the sale deed executed.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)
Shail/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest under Sections 302, 201 and 364/34 of the I.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmendra Sah
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
