Allowed

Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC31 Jul 2015CR. MISC./30378/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court released the petitioner on anticipatory bail in connection with police case No.62 of 2013 registering offences under various sections of the IPC related to kidnapping and abduction, subject to conditions and a surety bond.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was released on anticipatory bail via bond of 10,000/- with two sureties of equal amount under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. within 12 weeks.

Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30378 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2013 Thana -MAHNAR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

====================================================== Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhurilata (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 31-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered

¶5

for the offences punishable under Sections

¶6

363/365/366/379/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The prosecution case is that after ten years of marriage, the informant's wife found missing on 24.03.2013 when suspicion was raised against petitioner, co-accused Ranjeet Rai and Hari Kishan Prasad and Geeta Devi have abducted the wife of informant. In 164 Cr.P.C. statement, recorded after nine months of the occurrence, the wife of the informant alleged that the petitioner and others forcibly made her to sit in Bolero vehicle but she was actually kidnapped by co-accused Ranjeet Rai, who subsequently ravished her.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30378 of 2015 (2) dt.31-07-2015

¶10

2/2

¶11

for the occurrence of 24.03.2013, the complaint was filed on 16.04.2013, which came to be registered as police case on 05.05.2013. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the co-accused Geeta Devi and Ranjeet Rai have been granted anticipatory bail vide Criminal Miscellaneous Nos.22108 of 2014 and 4260 of 2015.

¶12

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ` 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No.62 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶13

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶14

Ashwini/-

¶15

U T

Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash @ Vyas Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dhanji Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Paras Nath Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu Vs The State Of Bihar

Jiyasuddin @ Bhutali Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Ram Vs The State Of Bihar