Allowed

Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC31 Jul 2015CR. MISC./27157/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner in custody for extortion offences under Sections 384, 385, 387 IPC. Court granted bail intending to surrender due to lack of direct connection to the accused phone and potential lack of substantive offence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali.

Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27157 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1022 Year- 2014 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu S/o Shankar Mahto Resident of Mehandiganj, P.S. Mehandiganj, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 31-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.11.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of extortion of rupees thirty lakhs through phone leading to registration of the FIR against three unknown. The name of the petitioner sprang up when the petitioner confessed his guilt. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not connected with the mobile through which the extortion demand was made and even assuming the accusation no offence under Section 384 IPC is made out.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27157 of 2015 (2) dt.31-07-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

Moreover, the investigation has already concluded.

¶7

A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1022 of 2014.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

DKS/-

¶11

U T

Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish Kumar @ Dabbu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash @ Vyas Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dhanji Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Paras Nath Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jiyasuddin @ Bhutali Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja Mohan @ Raja Ram Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Ram Vs The State Of Bihar