Allowed

Tinku @ Lal Tamatar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Sept 2015CR. MISC./27339/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered release on bail for petitioners 2 and 3 in a theft case where petitioner 1's application was already disposed of. Bail was granted with a bond and sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties within four weeks and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Tinku @ Lal Tamatar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27339 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2015 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Tinku @ Lal Tamatar. 2. Sursan Prasad @ Sursain Prasad 3. Jitendra Kumar………………………………………. .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 09-09-2015 Vide order dated 20.07.2015, anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 1 Tinku @ Lal Tamatar has been disposed of. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Section 379/34 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that it was informed by the villagers that the informant’s brother and nephews committed theft of sand and bricks from the informant’s premises. It is also alleged that earlier accused persons also committed theft because there is land dispute in between them.

¶3

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27339 of 2015 (3) dt.09-09-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties and for the said reason the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners and the informant are Gotias.

¶7

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely, Sursan Prasad @ Sursain Prasad and Jitendra Kumar, be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶9

U.K./U T

¶10

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Tinku @ Lal Tamatar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tinku @ Lal Tamatar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Narayan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandeshwar Das and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Umrawati Devi and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.