Allowed

Nishant Tandon v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC1 Oct 2015CR. MISC./25382/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to a husband accused under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. Bail was conditioned on its confirmation within one year based on matrimonial harmony restoration or failure of the wife to appear.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year, subject to confirmation within one year based on matrimonial harmony restoration or other specified conditions.

Nishant Tandon Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25382 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1221 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Nishant Tandon S/o Late Ashok Tandon R/o House No. 572, Ground Floor, Sector - 4, Vaishali, Dist. - Gaziabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Smt. Nupur Tandon W/o Nishant Tandan, D/o Sri Rakesh Kumar Tandon R/o Ram Bux Lane, Chowk, P.S. Chowk, District - Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh-5(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04/ 01-10-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The basic accusation is of torture for nonfulfillment of the dowry demand. The petitioner and the complainant are present. On the joint prayer of the parties, the matter was

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25382 of 2015 (04) dt.01-10-2015

¶4

2/3

¶5

referred to the Mediation and the report of the Mediator dated 01.10.2015 at Flag ‘X’ reflects that the mediation could not conclude due to paucity of time. On the joint prayer of the parties the matter is being taken up on merits.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner admits his marriage and birth of a female child and is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 16 of the petition, which reads as follows:-

¶7

“That the petitioner is ready to keep her wife with him with full dignity and honour.”

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that the complainant is ready to accept the offer of the petitioner.

¶9

It is admitted between the parties that the complainant will join the petitioner at Gaziabad where he is employed on 13^th or 14^th of this month.

¶10

Considering the present stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25382 of 2015 (04) dt.01-10-2015

¶12

3/3

¶13

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 1221 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶14

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed within one year by the learned court below in three eventualities:- (i) on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony; (ii) or if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue; and (iii) or if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court.

¶15

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶16

DKS/-

¶17

U T

Nishant Tandon v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nishant Tandon v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bullu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bharat Lal Yadav @ Bharat Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pradeep Chaudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Horil Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar