Allowed

Gopal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Oct 2015CR. MISC./38995/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, conditional upon his surrender within six weeks to the trial court. The petitioner, though not initially named in the FIR, was implicated during investigation but had not been summoned for trial prior to this order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail conditional upon surrender within six weeks to the learned Court below in Roh P.S. Case No. 04 of 2008.

Gopal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38995 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2008 Thana -ROH District- NAWADA ====================================================== 1. Gopal Singh S/o Karu Singh Resident of Village Sambharigarh, P.S. Roh, District Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das(Spl.App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 337, 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 3(1) (x), 3 (ii) (iv) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶4

The prosecution case is that while stealing Government solar light one Sanjay Yadav was apprehended and handed over to the Chowkidar, but he flee away. Thereafter the First Information Report named accused persons fired, as a result Sanjay died on the spot. The petitioner was not named in the First Information Report but during investigation his name sprang up but he was not sent up for trial, consequently, differing with the Final Form the learned

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38995 of 2015 (2) dt.01-10-2015

¶6

¶7

court below took cognizance in 2009 itself.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the First Information Report. His name sprang up during investigation but was not sent up for trial. Cognizance was taken differing with Final Form, but the processes were never executed against the petitioner, as a result the petitioner could not move before the Court for bail at the earlier point of time. Statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶9

The aforesaid facts constitute ground for consideration of prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 04 of 2008, pending in the court of learned A.D.J.-I, Nawada.

¶10

With this observation this application is disposed

¶11

of.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

P.K./-

¶14

U T

Gopal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bullu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bharat Lal Yadav @ Bharat Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pradeep Chaudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Horil Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajneesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar