Allowed

Jitendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2015CR. MISC./22398/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, and 304B read with Section 498A. The court released the petitioner on bail bond with sureties under Section 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount.

Jitendra Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22398 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -236 Year- 2013 Thana -MASRAKH District- SARAN ====================================================== 1. Jitendra Mahto Son of Bhaju Mahto resident of village - Masharak Takhat, P.S. Mashrak, Distt. - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. T.P.Mandal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341,323,324 and 304B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The accusation is of killing the daughter of the informant after one year of marriage for non fulfillment of dowry demands. The informant along with his cousin Mukesh Mahto went to the inlaw’s house of his daughter. Seeing the dead body of his daughter the informant proceeded to inform the police when the petitioner, co accused Nagendra and Bhajji and others being villagers of the husband of the victim made assault to the informant. Specific accusation of assault with knife is against co accused Bhajji Mahto.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22398 of 2015 (2) dt.06-07-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not the family member of the husband of the victim and only omnibus and general accusation is that he also assaulted. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶7

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Masrak P.S. Case No. 236 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶8

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶9

Anil/-

¶10

U T

Jitendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Prafulla Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar @ Vikash Vs The State Of Bihar

Basisth Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vinod Kumar Singh @ Bablu Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Urmila Devi @ Mina Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar