Allowed

Saheb Dewan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 May 2015CR. MISC./15012/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with theft under Section 379 IPC and Section 136 of the Electricity Act. The court relied on the conclusion of investigation and the bail granted to a co-accound.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Bagaha.

Saheb Dewan Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15012 of 2015

¶2

	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -309 Year- 2014 Thana -BAGHA District-
	WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== 1. Saheb Dewan Son of Mansoor Dewan resident of Village - Bargadawa, P.S. - Ramnaar, District - West Champaran.
	.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
	Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3 (App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2	12-05-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
	The petitioner is languishing in custody since 6.1.2015
	in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, section 136 of the Electricity Act was added.

¶3

It is alleged that three transformers worth Rs.1,62000/were stolen. During investigation, the investigating agency found Niyaz Dewan and Amjad Ali being involved in committing the theft of transformers who were apprehended and confessed their guilt and in their confession name of the petitioner transpired.

¶4

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that except the confession there is nothing against the petitioner

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15012 of 2015 (2) dt.12-05-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

and there is no recovery from the petitioner though the petitioner is accused in for similar cases. It is further submitted that investigation has already concluded and co accused Niyaz Dewan has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 8971 of 2015.

¶8

petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Bagaha in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 309 of 2014.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

Anil/-

¶12

U T

Saheb Dewan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saheb Dewan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Vidyanand Rai @ Bidyanand Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Chando Yadav @ Chandu Yadav @ Chandu Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Yugal Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Chirkut Sahni @ Chirkut Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar