Allowed

Parnav Kumar @ Pranav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC5 Aug 2015CR. MISC./12767/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, husband of the complainant, in a case alleging dowry-related torture and cruelty under Sections 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, after mediation failed and the petitioner expressed willingness to maintain marital dignity.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail for 12 weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Parnav Kumar @ Pranav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12767 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Parnav Kumar @ Pranav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kr. Ranjit Ranjan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 05-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending arrest in a compliant case wherein process was directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶3

The basic accusation is of torture for non-fulfilment of the dowry demand.

¶4

The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of the Bihar State Legal Services Authority vide order dated 30.04.2015. The report of Mediator at flag-„A‟ dated 03.08.2015 suggests that in spite of best and sincere efforts the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation.

¶5

The matter was heard on 4^th of August, 2015 when the

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12767 of 2015 (4) dt.05-08-2015

¶7

2/3

¶8

petitioner expressed his willingness in presence of the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. Though, statement to that effect has also been made in paragraph no. 13 of the petition which reads as follows:-

¶9

“That the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.”

¶10

On prayer of the learned counsel for the complainant, the matter was passed over on 04.08.2015. Today the petitioner is present but the complainant is not present, however, learned counsel for the complainant submits that due to past conduct of the petitioner the complainant is not ready to accept the offer of the petitioner.

¶11

The marriage between the petitioner and the complainant having no issue and both being employed as Engineer are not in dispute.

¶12

Considering the stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.DJ.M., Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 155C of 2013, subject to the conditions as

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12767 of 2015 (4) dt.05-08-2015

¶14

3/3

¶15

laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶16

The present order will not preclude the parties to

¶17

resolve the issue otherwise.

¶18

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

Amrendra/-
U T

Parnav Kumar @ Pranav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parnav Kumar @ Pranav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Praveen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raj Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Ashraf Ali Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shankar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandrika Sah Vs The State Of Bihar