Allowed

Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2015CR. MISC./12083/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a murder case under IPC Section 302. The court noted that the informant did not name the petitioner in the FIR, though investigation showed he visited a co-accused's house. Being not directly implicated in the killing, bail was granted on furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Ajay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12083 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2013 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Ajay Yadav S/o Late Surju Yadav R/o Jhowa Bahiyar , P.s. Bariyarpur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 10-04-2015 Heard both sides.

¶3

The petitioner seeks bail in a case under Section 302

¶4

and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Kishori Yadav named eight persons and alleged that they all dragged his son Ashok Yadav from a tractor and took him to the maize filed. The accused persons cut the neck of his son and took away the head along with them. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. No specific allegation is made against the petitioner. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was found talking with Bijay Darshan, driver of Doman Darshan, on the date of occurrence and he also visited the house of co-accused Mrityunjay Yadav, who is named in the F.I.R.

¶6

Considering the facts that the informant did not name the petitioner in the F.I.R. and name of the petitioner figured in the

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12083 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

case during the course of investigation but nobody has alleged that the petitioner also took part in killing of Ashok Yadav, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Adhoc A.D.J. VIII, Munger in Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 27/2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 478 of 2013.

¶10

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶11

Dilip/-

¶12

U T

Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Das @ Avinash @ Shiv Nandan Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Atikur Rahman @ Lal Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Wakil Rai Vs The State Of Bihar