Allowed

Sabaiya Khatoon and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 May 2015L.P.A/655/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an interconnected Letters Patent Appeal against a PIL. It set aside the single judge's order and an order by the District Magistrate, directing reinstatement of appellants without back wages.

What did the court decide?

The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned orders, and directed reinstatement of the appellants without back wages.

Sabaiya Khatoon and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.655 of 2014

¶3

¶4

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2908 of 2014

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Sabaiya Khatoon W/O Md. Mahafuj , Resident of Jafra, Panchayat Panari, Post (Sripur) P.S. Belaganj, District - Gaya.

¶7

Upendra Kumar Sinha S/O Ram Chandra Sinha R/O village - Hemant Bigha, P.O. Samaspur, Panchayat Panari, P.S. Belaganj, Dist. Gaya.

¶8

.... .... Appellant/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gaya.

¶11

The District Education Officer, Gaya.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Gaya.

¶13

The Block Education Officer, Belaganj, Dist. Gaya.

¶14

The Panchayat Sachiv, Panchayat Panari P.S. Belaganj, Dist. Gaya.

¶15

.... .... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance :

¶17

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kritya Nand Jha, AC to SC 29

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶20

and

¶21

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

3 13-05-2015 Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents submit that the subject matter of this Letters Patent Appeal is the same as one in LPA No. 419 of 2015. Following the same, we allow the Appeal and set aside the order under appeal passed by the learned Single Judge. We also set aside the order dated 24.4.2007, passed by the 1^st respondent in the writ petition against the petitioners and direct

¶23

Patna High Court LPA No.655 of 2014 (3) dt.13-05-2015

¶24

2/2

¶25

that they shall be reinstated forthwith. However, they will not be entitled to any back wages for the period during which they were out of service. If any individual has already been appointed against the post held by each of the appellants, he shall be continued on ad hoc basis till a regular vacancy arises.

¶26

Interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ)

¶28

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶29

mrl

¶30

Sabaiya Khatoon and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabaiya Khatoon and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Param Enterprises p Ltd. Vs The Eastern Railways

Anjuman Islahul Musalimin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Phular Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The Union Of India and Ors. Vs Pawan Kumar Poddar and Ors.

Ganpat Prasad Vs The Union Of India and Ors.