The single judge dismissed a review petition filed belatedly by the State of Bihar, holding it against litigation policy after the accountancy of its own order granted time for compliance.
The review application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.419 of 2013 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20782 of 2012
====================================================== 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, New Secretariat, Patna
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 05-03-2014 This review petition has been placed under the heading “For Orders on Office Notes” for removal of defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.419 of 2013 (3) dt.05-03-2014
2
exceeding two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order dated 07.11.2012 before the Conservator of Forest.
dismissed.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
P.K.P.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition filed much after the grace period should be entertained.
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary and others
Laltun Thakur and others
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
