Patna High Court dismissed a civil review application regarding an impugned civil writ jurisdiction order, holding it was not a fit case for review.
Civil Review No.106 of 2014 dismissed as it was not a case for review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.106 of 2014 (3) dt.16-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.106 of 2014
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7947 of 2013
======================================================
Ram Prasad Gupta
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna & Anr.
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR
SAHOO
ORAL ORDER
3 16-07-2014 This is not a case for review. Accordingly, this review
application is dismissed.
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J)
Sanjeev/-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
Ram Prasad Gupta
The Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna & Anr.
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
