Allowed
Smt. Sita Devi v. Pramod Sah
Patna HCMJC/1526/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Patna High Court allowed an MJC application for restoration of C.W.J.C. No.12885 of 2013, which was previously dismissed for default due to non-appearance, and restored it to its original file.
What did the court decide?
MJC application allowed; writ application C.W.J.C. No.12885 of 2013 restored to original file.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Patna High Court MJC No.1526 of 2014 (3) dt.18-07-2014
¶2
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1526 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12885 of 2013 ====================================================== Smt. Sita Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Pramod Sah .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER |
|
| 3 18 |
-07-2014 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This M.J.C. application has been filed for restoration of C.W.J.C. No.12885 of 2013 which was dismissed for default when nobody appeared to press the writ application. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the statements made in the M.J.C. application, this M.J.C. application is allowed and the writ application being C.W.J.C. No.12885 of 2013 is restored to its original file. |
| (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) | |
| Saurabh/- U |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether an MJC application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for default should be allowed .
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Sita Devi
- respondent
Pramod Sah
Coram
AI extract
Mungeshwar Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court