A single judge bench dismissed a restoration application filed in 2002, observing that defects pointed out by the Registry remained unrectified despite the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2741 of 2002 (4) dt.24-04-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2741 of 2002 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Branch Manager,Agriculture Dev .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Jai Nath Prasad & Ora .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navaniti Pd. Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc2) |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 4 | 24-04-2014 None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this restoration application. |
| Though the restoration application is of the year 2002, still the defect, pointed out by Registry in its noting, dated 24.4.2014 has not been removed. In the circumstances, this application is dismissed for default. (I. A. Ansari, J) |
A.I./- (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
Branch Manager, Agriculture Dev
Jai Nath Prasad & Ora
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
