This miscellaneous jurisdiction case disposed of a contempt application after observing that promotion grants to eligible candidates were made in compliance with a prior court direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1429 of 2013 (2) dt.22-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1429 of 2013 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1565 of 2010
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
02. 22.01.2014 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It is evident from the show-cause that the
matter of promotion was placed before District Education Establishment Committee. Promotion to eligible candidates has already been granted in terms of the notification, contained in Annexure-A, which is sufficient
Patna High Court MJC No.1429 of 2013 (2) dt.22-01-2014
compliance of the direction of the Court.
Contempt Application stands disposed off in
light of the above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
SKM/-
Anusuchit Jati/Jan Jati Karmachari Sangh
Harendra Chaudhary
State Of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
