Disposed

Ram Mohan Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Jan 2014CWJC/20914/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court directed the State and Educational Authorities to permit 37 identified private candidates to participate in the 2014 examination and to complete pending enquiries before the exam process begins. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

What did the court decide?

Directed that 37 identified candidates be permitted to participate in the 2014 examination and that pending enquiries be completed within a reasonable time-frame.

Ram Mohan Prasad Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20914 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Ram Mohan Prasad Sinha S/O Shidh Nath Sinha, Resident of VillageKeshawpur, Police Station- Jhajha, District Jamui, presently posted: Incharge Head Master, Kumar Hari Shankar Vijay Intermediate High School, Keshawpur, Block Jhajha (Jamui).

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

The District Education Officer, Jamui. 4. The District Programme Officer, Secondary Education, Jamui. 5. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 6. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Samitti, Patna. 7. The Examination Controller, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jawahar Pd. Karn ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 3 21-01-2014 It is apparent from the communication dated 19.10.2013 of the D.E.O. that 37 private candidates appeared for verification and they were identified and recommendation for issuance of OMR forms has been issued. There should not be any controversy with regard to those 37 candidates in view of such communication well in time as well as deposit of fees and forms.

¶6

Respondents are directed to ensure that at least these 37 candidates are not prevented from participation in the on-coming examination in the year 2014.

¶7

Patna High Court CWJC No.20914 of 2013 (3) dt.21-01-2014

¶8

2 / 2

¶9

The other enquiry which has been talked about by the counsel representing the Examination Board may be carried out and completed within a reasonable time-frame so that the whole exercise is completed much before the process of examination begins.

¶10

This will be in addition to 37 candidates who have already been recommended by the DEO earlier.

¶11

Writ application itself stands disposed of with above direction.

¶12

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶13

R.K.Pathak/-

Ram Mohan Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Mohan Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham a.n.m. Training School Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravi Prakash Narayan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravi Prakash Narayan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shankar Pd. Choudhary Vs The Bihar Public Service Commission and Ors.

Bhupal Krishna Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Briksh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.