This contempt application was dropped in the absence of any appearance on behalf of the petitioners, while maintaining the status quo from a previous order.
Contempt application dropped due to non-appearance of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1218 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19142 of 2011
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners.
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the Opposite party nos. 1 and 2 filed
show-cause stating that they had maintained status quo passed by this Court vide order dated 18.11.2011.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.
This contempt application is dropped, accordingly.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
Suresh Pandey
Shivakant Pandey
Baleshwar Pandey
Kishore Kunal
Ashok Kumar Sinha
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
