The writ petition became infructuous because the warrant of arrest against the respondent in the underlying matter was executed, redressing the petitioner's grievance. The court disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.424 of 2009 (16) dt.26-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.424 of 2009
| ====================================================== Rashmi Bhola .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Partha Sarthy, Advocate |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 16 | 26-02-2014 Mr. Partha Sarthy, learned counsel for the State submits |
| that Shashi Kumar Bhola against whom warrant of arrest was | |
| issued for non-compliance of the order of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna has been finally arrested and as such the prayer made by the writ petitioner stands redressed. In view of the aforesaid statement made at the bar, this writ application has become infructuous and it is disposed of as such. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) |
KHAN/-
Rashmi Bhola
The State Of Bihar
SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
