The court disposed of a contempt application by holding that the order in a related miscellaneous jurisdiction case and analogous cases would govern the petitioner's claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1075 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Sanjay Kumar Yadav S/O Sri Lorik Yadav R/O Village - Baruhan, P.S. Bagen Gola, District - Buxar ( Bihar ) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Sri Ashok Kumar Sinha, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. Sri Abhayanand Singh, Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. Smt. R. Malar Vizhi, Chairman Constable Selection Board, Shahabad Range, Sahabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Roy, Gp5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2014 The order, which has been or is going to be passed in MJC No.871 of 2012 and other analogous cases, will govern the claim of the petitioner since the writ application was disposed of in light of the Division Bench’s decision.
Contempt Application is disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending contempt application is to be disposed of in light of the Division Bench decision in the akin writ application.
SANJAY KUMAR YADAV
STATE OF BIHAR
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
