single judge allowed a Contempt Application by observing that the writ application was disposed of per the Division Bench's decision in an analogous MJC No. 871 of 2012 case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1055 of 2013 (2) dt.15-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1055 of 2013 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 790 of 2011
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Ashok Kumar Sinha, Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
02. 15.01.2014 The Order, which has been or is going to be passed in MJC No. 871 of 2012 and other analogous cases, will govern the claim of the petitioner, since the writ application was disposed off in light of the Division Bench’s decision.
Contempt Application is disposed off, accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
SKM/-
1 issue framed by the court
whether the Contempt Application requires disposal in light of the Division Bench's decision in MJC No. 871 of 2012
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
MJC No. 871 of 2012Referred¶14
MJC No. 871 of 2012
Arun Kumar Bharti
Bhawesh Chandra Prasad
Loknath Tiwari
The State Of Bihar Through Ashok Kumar Sinha
Ashish Ranjan Sinha
Jaglall Choudhary
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
