30. The learned counsel, Mr. Verma, for the appellant submitted that since the document is registered and the same has been produced from the custody of the appellant, the presumption is that entire consideration amount was paid. No doubt, there is a presumption of payment of consideration amount, if the document is produced from the custody of the vendee but then this presumption is rebuttable. The learned counsel relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Janak Dulari Devi vs. Kapildeo Rai 2011 (6) SCC 555 . From perusal of the said decision, it appears that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that ‘ as per practice of ta khubzul badlain prevalent in Bihar (that is, title to the property passing to the purchaser only when there is exchange of equivalents), where a sale deed recites that the entire sale consideration has been paid and possession has been delivered, but the registration receipt is retained by the vendor and possession of the property is also retained by the vendor, as the agreed consideration (either full or a part) is not received, irrespective of the recitals in the sale deed, the title would not pass to the purchaser, till payment of the entire consideration to the vendor and the registration receipt is obtained by the purchaser in exchange.’ In the present case, the specific case of the plaintiff is that not a single farthing has been paid. Therefore, merely because
