The petition for re-connection of an electricity line was disposed of after the petitioner admitted in an interlocutory application that the line had already been restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2911 of 2014
====================================================== Mohan Saw son of Radhe Saw, resident of Village-Hulasganj, P.O. : Hulasganj, District : Jehanabad (Bihar)
.... .... Petitioner/s
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has sought a re-connection of his electricity line. According to his own statement a revised bill has been supplied on 18.1.2014 and the line stands restored.
Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, appearing for the respondents
has referred to the statement made in paragraph-4 of the I.A. No.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2911 of 2014 (2) dt.02-12-2014
2
6367 of 2014 in which the petitioner has admitted that the line stands restored.
Considering the circumstances, the writ petition and the interlocutory application are disposed of. (Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/U
Mohan Saw
Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd.
South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
