No one appeared for the petitioners. The court held the writ petition not maintainable under Article 226 as the dispute concerns a privately managed institution governed by its own Governing body, and dismissed the application.
None. Application dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16661 of 2010
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the University : Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha For the State : Md. M. Ashraft, AC to SC-27
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
allow them to work against Class III/Class IV posts in S.K. College, Thatia, Rosera( Samastipur) said to be affiliated to Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga.
2
cannot be adjudicated upon in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. I find the writ application to be not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
ArunKumar/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application regarding employment direction is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Ram Chandra Das
Ratan Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Director, Higher Education, Bihar
The Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University
The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
