Single judge oral order dismissing an interlocutory application and a writ petition as premature, directing petitioners to challenge a prior annexure first.
Let the petitioners file a fresh application challenging the prior benefit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16462 of 2012 (6) dt.07-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16462 of 2012
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Nath Pathak For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambasta Gp14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER ***************
06. 07.01.2014 I. A. No. 4550 of 2013 Interlocutory Application is rejected. Writ application is also dismissed. Let the petitioners file a fresh application,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16462 of 2012 (6) dt.07-01-2014
challenging the promotion, merger, whatever it is, of persons, who had been given the benefit in the year 1995, first. Unless the petitioner succeed in setting aside Annexure-2, no interference can be made with the gradation list, which is under challenge in the present writ application.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
SKM/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to intervention in the promotion and gradation list challenged in prior proceedings.
Shambhu Kumar
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department Of Animal And Fish Resources
The Director, Fisheries, Govt. Of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
