The Patna High Court dismissed the writ application as infructuous upon the production of an office order revoking the petitioner's suspension and restoring him to service with a warning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11595 of 2013 (3) dt.03-07-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11595 of 2013 ====================================================== |
||
|---|---|---|
| Bhola Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
||
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
||
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
||
| 3 | 03-07-2014 | Mr.Mukherjee has appeared for the University officials |
| and has produced an office order of the Registrar, contained in | ||
| memo no.B/1240 dated 02.07.2014, from which it appears that | ||
| under the orders of the Vice-Chancellor the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked with warning and orders have been |
||
| passed for payment of his subsistence allowance and he has been posted in some other college. |
||
| In that view of the matter, this writ application has become infructuous. The same is disposed of as such. (Jayanandan Singh, J) |
Arvind/-
| U |
|---|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application becomes infructuous upon revocation of suspension and posting of the petitioner.
Bhola Prasad
The State of Bihar
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
