Criminal Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the Court after learning counsel for the petitioner sought withdrawal based on averments in the State's counter affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ No.684 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Ram Udar Singh Son Of Late Ramchandra Singh Residnet Of Village Sirauli Tola Hanuman Nagar P.S. Riga Distt Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Director General Of Police Bihar Patna 3. Deputy Inspector General Of Police Muzaffarpur Division Muzffarpur 4. Superintendent Of Police Sitamarhi 5. Deputy Superintendent Of Police Sadar Sitamarhi 6. Station House Officer P.S. Sitamarhi Distt Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 3 07-02-2014 Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. In the background of averments made in paragraph10 of the counter affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
Sudha/-
Ram Udar Singh
The State Of Bihar
Director General Of Police Bihar Patna
Deputy Inspector General Of Police Muzaffarpur Division Muzffarpur
Superintendent Of Police Sitamarhi
Deputy Superintendent Of Police Sadar Sitamarhi
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
