The Patna High Court dismissed the criminal writ petition as withdrawn at the behest of the petitioner, who sought to raise grievances at a later procedural stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1251 of 2011 (11) dt.10-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ No.1251 of 2011
====================================================== Hem Prabha Rai, W/O Ram Sharkar Poddar, R/O Vill.- Badhi, P.S.- Lohiya Nagar, Distt.- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Monika Kumari, D/O Sitaram Panday, R/O Professor Colony, Ward No.-25, P.S.- Farbisganj, Distt.- Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, Adv. For the Informant : Mr. Chandan Kumar Verma, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sandip Singh, AC to GP-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 11 10-02-2014 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of instant petition to raise her grievances at an appropriate stage of the proceeding.
With the aforesaid liberty, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
PN/-
Hem Prabha Rai
The State Of Bihar
Monika Kumari
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
