Dismissed

Ranjeet Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC16 Dec 2014CR. MISC./607/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No.607 of 2014, lifted judicial review regarding quashing of an FIR under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the application, which was granted, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.

Ranjeet Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Patna HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.607 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -554 Year- 2013 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== 1. Ranjeet Singh son of Late Ram Ujagar Singh 2. Rajiv Kumar son of Late Ram Ujagar Singh 3. Sanjeet Kumar son of Late Ram Ujagar Singh 4. Ram Dulari Devi @ Ram Kumari Devi wife of Late Ram Ujagar Singh. 5. Chandan Kumar son of Late Surendra Singh 6. Rohit Kumar @ Bittu Singh son of Late Umesh Singh 7. Kundan Kumar son of Late Ram Sundar Singh All residents of village - Bihat, Tola - Asrahpur, P.S. Barauni (F.C.I.), District Begusarai. 8. Wakil Singh son of Late Ram Sagar Singh, resident of village Sabaura, P.S.- Barauni Refinery, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ramchandra Kunwar son of Late Jagruk Singh 3. Pinki Devi daughter of Ram Chandra Kumar Both resident of village- Manohar Tand Basti, P.S.-Sindri, DistrictDhanbad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. T.N.Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 16-12-2014 Since notices have been served upon opposite nos.2 and 3, with consent of the petitioners, the matter has been heard on merit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

¶4

counsel for the State.

¶5

The petitioners seek quashing of the FIR of Barauni (Refinery) P.S. Case No.554 of 2013 registered for the offences

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.607 of 2014 (3) dt.16-12-2014

¶7

2/2

¶8

punishable under sections 498A, 341, 342, 355 and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present application.

¶10

Leave is granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶11

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Md.S./U T

Ranjeet Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sugandhi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chintu Roy @ Chintu Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chandrabhan Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Alka Govila Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Gaya and Ors.

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kr. Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jagdish Prasad, Manish Kumar huf Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Gaya and Ors.