Rahul Jha v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna HC allowed bail to the petitioner in a case involving Section 307 IPC and Arms Act by requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5342 of 2014 ====================================================== Rahul Jha, S/O Manikant Jha @ Nunu Jha, Resident of Village- Kahra, P.SSaharsa, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. T.P. Mandal, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER 3 04-04-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is one of the named accused of the case which has been registered under Section 307 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of firing which has caused injury on the waste.
Submission is that there is case and counter case. The counter case is under Section 307 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. There was no repletion. Present case is the first case in which the petitioner has been implicated. The injury was not on vital part of the body. The petitioner is having passed B.Sc. with Ist Division and is a student of M.Sc. and has been wrongly
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5342 of 2014 (3) dt.04-04-2014
2
framed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 603 of 2013.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail in a case pertaining to Section 307 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAHUL JHA
- respondent
STATE OF BIHAR
Coram
SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court