Allowed

Nanhak Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jan 2014CR. MISC./3793/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court directed that the petitioner be released on bail after the framing of charge, following the grant of bail to a co-accused. The court imposed specific conditions on the bailors and directed the Trial Court to expedite the trial by fixing specific witness dates.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including bailor affidavit and trial expedition.

Nanhak Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3793 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== Nanhak Manjhi, son of late Shibu Manjhi, resident of village Haridih, P.S. Nimchak Bathani, Distt Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 29-01-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 4.1.2013 passed in Cr. Misc. 67 of 2013.

¶3

Considering that the co-accused has been granted bail by this Court by an order dated 18.12.2013 passed in Cr. Misc. 48095 of 2013, after framing of charge, if the case is not bifurcated for the said purpose, let the Petitioner above named, be also released on bail after charge, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 36 of 2002 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3793 of 2014 (2) dt.29-01-2014

¶5

2 / 2

¶6

accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be physically present on each date of Trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶7

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the Trial and for which reason, he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for each witnesses for their examination along with a copy of this order to the Superintendent of Police concerned, who is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in the Trial.

¶8

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶9

S.Ali/-

Nanhak Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nanhak Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Khurshid Ansari @ Khurshid Anwar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Bihari Singh @ Bipin Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bijay Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar