The High Court at Patna dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition by the petitioners due to non-prosecution and failure to file a supplementary affidavit within the prescribed time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3620 of 1993
====================================================== Rajendra Mandal son of Sri Basudeo Mandal & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5. 07-04-2014 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioners, either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment, nor in compliance with order dated 13-09-2013, supplementary affidavit has been filed. In view of order dated 13-09-2013, the petition was required to be rejected due to non-filing of the supplementary affidavit. The petition stands dismissed due to nonprosecution. This order was passed in presence of Sri Parmeshwar Mehta, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
Rajendra Mandal and Ors
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
