The Petitioner, Kittu Kumar, moved for quashing the order dated 14.07.2014, which rejected his application for discharge in Sessions Trial No.59 of 2014. The Hon'ble Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash reviewed the records and found no reason to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34434 of 2014 (2) dt.21-08-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34434 of 2014 |
|---|
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- PATNA |
| ====================================================== Kittu Kumar, son of late Sunil Singh, r/o village- Barah, P.S.-Rani Talab, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER |
| 2/ 21-08-2014 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated |
| 14.07.2014 passed by the_Ad hoc_Additional Sessions Judge, VII, Patna, in Sessions Trial No.59 of 2014 by which the application |
| for discharge has been rejected. |
| Having gone through the records, I do not find any reason to interfere in the matter. |
| The application is dismissed. |
| JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the rejection of the discharge application by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge.
Whether there are sufficient grounds to quash the order dated 14.07.2014.
Kittu Kumar
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
