Petitioner applied for quashing of the order of cognizance dated 20.5.2013. The Court held that questions of fact cannot be examined at this stage and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3056 of 2014
Arising Out of Ariyari P.S. Case No.27, Year- 2013, G.R. No. 233 of 2013, Thana -ARIYARI District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Ravindra Prasad, s/o late Saudagar Mahto of Village- Chandi, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bihar State Electricity Board .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 5 05-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance dated 20.5.2013 assed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sheikhpura, in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 27 of 2013, G.R. No. 233 of 2013. Considering that the petitioner seeks quashing on questions of fact which cannot be gone into at this stage, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application stands dismissed. S.Ali/- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the order of cognizance based on questions of fact.
Ravindra Prasad
The State Of Bihar
Bihar State Electricity Board
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
