Dismissed

Baby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jan 2014CR. MISC./247/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order is in response to a petition for quashing an FIR under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 409 and 120B. The High Court declined to interfere as no case existed against the petitioner at the time, leaving the matter for consideration if a future order is passed regarding the proposed reopening of investigation.

What did the court decide?

The applications for quashing were disposed of with the court declining to interfere given no existing case against the petitioner; parties to approach if an order regarding the reopening of investiga

Baby Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.247 of 2014 (2) dt.07-01-2014

¶2

	IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.247 of 2014
	====================================================== Baby Kumari .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
	with Criminal Miscellaneous No.316 of 2014 ======================================================
	Smt. Baby Kumari .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2	07-01-2014 The present application has been filed for quashing
	of the FIR of Kurtha (Manikpur) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2012 and 98
	of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467,
	468, 420, 471, 472, 409 and 120B of the IPC pending in the court of learned CJM, Jehanabad.
	It is submitted that petitioners were not sent up for
	trial due to lack of evidence during investigation, the final form
	has been brought on record as Annexure-3. The petitioner is
	apprehensive of an application filed by S.H.O., Manikpur (O.P.) to
	the CJM, Jehanabad with a prayer to permission to reopen the
	investigation but no order has been passed by learned CJM,
	Jehanabad on the application of the S.H.O., Manikpur (O.P.).

¶3

Hence, at present, since no case exists against the

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.247 of 2014 (2) dt.07-01-2014

¶5

petitioner this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matters. However, the petitioners may raise their contentions if any order is being passed on the final form.

¶6

Accordingly, the applications are disposed off.

¶7

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶8

Amrendra/-

Baby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamshad Alam Khan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kamala Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pappu Khan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Smt. Baby Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kameshwar Pd. Singh Vs The State Of Bihar