Single bench oral order rejecting the petitioner's application to quash an F.I.R. in an assault case, noting investigation had concluded and a charge sheet was filed.
Application for quashing dismissed with liberty to raise contentions at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.158 of 2014
| ============================= Pappu Khan Versu The State Of Bihar & Anr |
=============== .... .. s .... .... Op |
====== .. Petit posite P |
==== ioner. arties. |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Chandra Sa For the State: Mr. Uma Shankar Pra ------------------------------------------------- |
hani, Advocate. sad Singh, A.P.P. -------------------------- |
---------- | ------ |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUST SINGH ORAL ORDER |
ICE DINESH KUM |
AR |
|
| 2 06-01-2014 Heard learned coun |
sels for the |
petit |
ioner |
and the State. |
|||
The present applic |
ation has been |
file |
d for |
quashing the F.I.R. of She |
rghati P.S. Ca |
se No |
. 363 |
of 2011 registered for the |
offences punis |
hable |
under |
Sections 323, 341, 379/34 |
of the I.P.C. |
and |
27 of |
the Arms Act. |
|||
It is submitted by |
learned couns |
el fo |
r the |
petitioner that the accusat |
ion of assault |
is ag |
ainst |
Amir Khan. It is very |
fairly submi |
tted |
that |
investigationhasalread |
yconcluded |
and |
the |
petitioner has already been |
charge sheete |
d. |
|
Considering the afo |
resaid facts, |
this |
Court |
is not inclined to interfer |
e. |
||
The application is |
disposed off w |
ith li |
berty |
to the petitioner to raise |
all the cont |
entio |
ns at |
the appropriate stage. |
U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for quashing of the F.I.R. registered under Sections 323, 341, 379/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act deserves quashing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pappu Khan
The State Of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
