Patna High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail in a murder case. The court held that due to the specific nature of accusations and gravity of the offence, privilege of anticipatory bail was not inclined to be granted to the petitioners.
The bail petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23168 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2013 Thana -SISWAN District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1. Birendra Kumar Ram S/o Late Sitaram Rai AND Anr.Chhajawa Balia, P.S.-Andar, District-Siwan. 2. Punjesh Ram S/o Shri Vinay Ram Resident of Village-Santhi, P.S.Raghunathpur, District-Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yashraj Bardhan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 15-09-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23168 of 2014 (3) dt.15-09-2014
2
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in a murder case given the gravity of the offence and specific accusations against them.
Birendra Kumar Ram and Anr.
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
