High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, and 504 IPC, noting the specific nature of the accusation and the presence of a counter-case involving an alleged injury.
Petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16045 of 2014 (4) dt.15-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16045 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -366 Year- 2013 Thana -DARBHANGA SADAR District- DARBHANGA
====================================================== 1. Yogeshwar Paswan @ Yugeshwar Paswan Son Of Late Sanichar Paswan Resident Of Village-Chhapkipari, P.S.-Sadar, District-Darbhanga (Bihar)
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shaheen Begum(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
4 15-09-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Md. Ibrarul/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing allegations of offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 502 IPC.
Yogeshwar Paswan
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
