Allowed

Shyama Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Aug 2014CR. MISC./22222/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition, the High Court released the petitioner on bail in anticipation of arrest in a criminal case involving offenses under the IPC and Arms Act, imposing standard conditions including surrender of a close relative as a surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 5000 with two sureties, one being a close relative, subject to specified conditions.

Shyama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22222 of 2014

¶2

Arising out of P.S. Case No. -85 Year- 2012 Thana - MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI =================================================== Shyama Devi Wife of Ram Nandan Thakur Resident of Village - Khorampur, P.S.-Matihani, Dist.-Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anuradha Singh, APP. =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶3

02. 02.08.2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶4

State.

¶5

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶6

Considering that the Petitioner is a lady without going into the veracity of the allegations, let her be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 85 of

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22222 of 2014 (2) dt.02-08-2014

¶8

¶9

2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶10

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶11

Vikash/-

¶12

U T

Shyama Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyama Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Bhagat and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shams Firoz Mian @ Shams Firoz and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Karan Raj Vs The State Of Bihar

Sohrai Sao Vs The State Of Bihar