Dismissed

Ravi Shankar Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC18 Nov 2014CR. MISC./17395/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of a non-discharge order, holding that questions of fact cannot be examined at this stage under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

The petition for quashing the order of non-discharge was dismissed; the trial was directed to be concluded expeditiously.

Ravi Shankar Pandey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17395 of 2014

¶2

	Arising Out of Complaint Case No.C-7 Year- 2008 District- WEST CHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Pandey, son of late Rajdeo Pandey, resident of village Tarkulava, P.S. Chautarava, Distt. West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ram Jee Upadhyay, son of Raghunath Upadhyay, resident of village Tarkulara, P.S. Chautarava, Distt. West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prithvi Nath Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. J. Upadhyay, APP ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
2	18-11-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
	The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of non
	discharge dated 21.2.2014 passed by the Adhoc Additional
	District Judge-IIIrd, Bagaha (West Champaran) in Sessions Trial
	No. 58 of 2012 arising out of Complaint Case No. 07 of 2008.

¶3

Considering that the Petitioner seeks quashing on questions of fact which cannot be gone into at the stage of 482 Cr. P.C., I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶4

The application stands dismissed.

¶5

The Trial Court is directed to conclude the Trial expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any Party for which reason, he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for each witnesses for their

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17395 of 2014 (2) dt.18-11-2014

¶7

2/2

¶8

examination along with a copy of this order to the Superintendent of Police concerned, who is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that there is

¶9

no further delay in the Trial.

¶10

S.Ali/-
U T

¶11

(Anjana Prakash, J)

Ravi Shankar Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Shankar Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulab Chand Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Savita Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Kalim @ Kalim Uddin and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Khurshid Rabbani Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jitendra Prasad Gupta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kishore Mishra and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.