Naresh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Honorary Single Judge dismissed the second bail application as petitioner had no new ground compared to earlier rejection after examination of case diary.
Honorary Single Judge dismissed the second bail application as petitioner had no new ground compared to earlier rejection after examination of case diary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15577 of 2014
| ============================================= Naresh Sah , son of Dashrath Sah, resident of village–Bark Mirganj, District Purnea .... .... Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Op ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. |
========= ona, P.S. Petitioner/s posite Party/s ========= |
|
|---|---|---|
| ============================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUM ORAL ORDER |
========= AR |
|
| 2 | 09-04-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. |
|
| This is the 2ndattempt for grant of bail i | n Barari P.S. | |
| Case No. 218 of 2011, corresponding to Sessions T | rial No. 373 | |
| of 2013. Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner wa | s rejected on | |
| 4.10.2013 vide Cr. Misc. No. 30325 of 2013. At | the time of | |
| rejection of bail petition earlier case diary was su | mmoned and | |
| after examining the case diary the prayer for | bail of the | |
| petitioner was rejected. I do not find any new petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) |
ground. The |
Praful/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail on the second attempt after earlier rejection based on case diary.
Naresh Sah
The State Of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court