The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail in a rape case. Rejecting the claim of false implication, the court held that the specific nature of the rape accusation and medical evidence precluded the grant of bail.
The petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14054 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2013 Thana -AMAUR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Md. Izhar Alam @ Md. Izhar Son of Md. Bare @ Abdul Bari Resident of Village- Chhota Lal Toli, P.S- Amour, District- Purnia. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 04-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14054 of 2014 (2) dt.04-08-2014
2
specific accusation of rape against the petitioner and the complaint is supported by ultra sound report showing six and half month’s pregnancy of the complainant, which prima facie supports the prosecution case.
Chandran U T
(Vikash Jain, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who apprehends arrest for rape-related offences under the IPC.
Md. Izhar Alam @ Md. Izhar
The State of Bihar
VIKASH JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
