Petitioner sought relief apprehending arrest under the S.C./S.T. (P.O.A.) Act alleging false implication. Court held the petition non-maintainable due to the statutory bar under Section 18 of the said Act and dismissed it.
Petition dismissed as non-maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13943 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2011 Thana -SARAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== 1. Rakesh Chaudhary S/O Byash Chaudhary Resident Of VillageBhatauliya, P.S- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 01-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13943 of 2014 (2) dt.01-08-2014
2
petition is not maintainable and it is accordingly
dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition fearing arrest under the S.C./S.T. (P.O.A.) Act is maintainable given the statutory bar under Section 18.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Chaudhary
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
